Mail slow? View this month’s issue, right online!
Our digital version is easy to share with colleagues. See this month’s issue and digital versions of previous issues too.
Get your products and services in front of thousands of decision-makers. View our print and online advertising options.
A one-on-one interview conducted by our editorial team with industry leaders in our market.
Discover the newest promotions and collaborations within the industry.
Easy-to-digest data for your business.
Shampoos, conditioners, colorants and styling products created by leading industry suppliers.
Creams, serums, facial cleansers and more created by leading suppliers to the skincare industry.
Detergents, fabric softeners and more created by leading suppliers to the fabric care industry.
Eyeshadows, lipsticks, foundations and more created by leading suppliers to the color cosmetics industry.
Bodywashes, and bar and liquid soaps created by leading suppliers to the personal cleanser industry.
Hard surface cleaners, disinfectants and more created by leading suppliers to the home care industry.
Eau de parfums and eau de toilettes, body sprays, mists and more created by leading suppliers to the fragrance industry.
UV lotions and creams, self-tanners and after-sun products created by leading suppliers to the suncare industry.
A detailed look at the leading US players in the global household and personal products industry.
A detailed look at the leading players outside the US in the global household and personal products industry.
Looking for a new raw material or packaging component supplier? Your search starts here.
When you need a new manufacturing partner or private label company, get started here.
Who owns that? To keep track of leading brands and their owners, click here.
An annual publication, Company Profiles features leading industry suppliers with information about markets served, products, technologies and services for beauty, pesonal care and home care.
New products and technologies from some of the brightest minds in the industry.
A one-on-one video interview between our editorial teams and industry leaders.
Listen to the leading experts in the global household and personal products industry.
Comprehensive coverage of key topics selected by sponsors.
Detailed research on novel ingredients and other solutions for the global household and personal care industry.
Company experts explain what works and why.
Exclusive content created by our affiliates and partners for the household and personal care industry.
Exciting news releases from the household and personal care industry.
Our targeted webinars provide relevant market information in an interactive format to audiences around the globe.
Discover exclusive live streams and updates from the hottest events and shows.
Looking for a job in the household and personal care industry, search no further.
Follow these steps to get your article published in print or online
What are you searching for?
The American Cleaning Institute’s response to “Defining Clean Skin,” which appeared in the February, 2017 issue of Happi.
May 1, 2017
By: Paul DeLeo,
American Cleaning Institute
Portions of the “Defining Clean Skin” article (Happi, February 2017) need clarification, specifically in reference to its descriptions of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) policies governing antibacterial soaps and the science behind product and ingredient safety. First off, the FDA did not issue a “ruling” directing the public to skip using antibacterial soaps. In September 2016, the agency did issue a final rule governing particular active ingredients that can be used in consumer antibacterial soaps and washes. FDA’s informal statement in a public blog post urging consumers to “skip” using antibacterial soaps was, in our view, an ill-considered and misguided PR statement. The blog posting was certainly not part of any “ruling.” The author of “Defining Clean Skin” makes reference to research questioning antimicrobial ingredient safety and efficacy. As we’ve written in these pages before, we are concerned that the FDA’s public blog statements following the September 2016 rule could sow consumer confusion about the amount of scientific data and research manufacturers have submitted over the years on product safety and effectiveness. Further, it can undermine what researchers are currently doing to answer new questions that have been identified by FDA. Manufacturers stand behind the product science, research and data submitted over several decades to FDA. Based on the newest understanding of the science and how the products are used, the industry was asked to undertake new studies. The data gaps identified by FDA are recent. Additionally, the agency has proposed some studies which have never been conducted before relating to this category of products. A Detailed Plan Nonetheless, the American Cleaning Institute has laid out a detailed work plan on additional safety and efficacy data for the three major ingredients used in consumer antibacterial soaps that aligns with FDA’s requests. Additional data will be submitted for other ingredients used in healthcare antiseptic products, consumer hand sanitizers, and food handler antiseptics that are covered under upcoming regulations. The author spends a great deal of time questioning the safety of the antibacterial ingredient triclosan. While triclosan did have a four-decade history of safe and effective use—backed by science—many manufacturers of consumer hand washes have already transitioned to the other major ingredients referenced above: benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride and chloroxylenol. As we have written, what’s most unfortunate about FDA’s recent activity was the highly charged public statements by FDA staff that claimed using antibacterial soaps “may do more harm than good over the long-term,” particularly in trying to tie every-day use of these products to the issue of antibiotic resistance. This ignores the agency’s own assessment of the information needed to address emerging science and the lack of any evidence that harm is actually occurring. The author also ignores research confirming that the use of antibacterial wash products in the home environment does not contribute to antibiotic or antibacterial resistance, substantiating previous research that showcased similar findings. A 2011 study, published in the peer-reviewed International Journal of Microbiology Research, compared the use of over-the-counter antibacterial liquid hand and body cleansers and antibacterial bar soaps against the use of non-antibacterial cleansers. Lead author Dr. Eugene Cole, who has spent 40 years in the field of environmental health research, said the study refutes claims that the use of antibacterial wash products have contributed to the selection and spread of drug-resistant bacteria on human skin. It is important for the American public—and industry consultants—to know that manufacturers are complying with the FDA data requests, as laid out by FDA itself. It is an agency-defined road map to certainty about the safety and efficacy of antibacterial soaps and washes. The formal rulemaking is clear on this. We believe that consumers and commercial customers can continue to use antibacterial soaps with confidence as they have for decades in millions of homes, offices, schools, daycare centers and other office settings. It is critical that discussions around the research, safety and access to antibacterial products be fully informed so that future regulations are sound and science-based.
Enter the destination URL
Or link to existing content
Enter your account email.
A verification code was sent to your email, Enter the 6-digit code sent to your mail.
Didn't get the code? Check your spam folder or resend code
Set a new password for signing in and accessing your data.
Your Password has been Updated !